Michelangelo
1475 - 1564
Italian
Beat Sir John Everett Millais by a single vote in Round 1. YOUR VOTE COUNTS!!!
Joan Miró
1893 - 1983
Spanish
Defeated Jean-François Millet by a single vote in Round 1. YOUR VOTE COUNTS!!!
Vote for the artist of your choice in the comments, or any other way that works for you. Commentary and links to additional work are welcome. Polls open for at least one month past posting.
Tuesday, July 21, 2015
Monday, July 20, 2015
Through History with The Monday Quiz: the 1050s
With every year that went by in the 1050s, the world got a little bit more like it is today.
1. In 1050, the kind of computer shown here first arrived in Europe. An invention of the Islamic golden age, it was used for calculating or predicting the time, local latitude, and the position of the moon and stars.
2. The Phoenix Hall of Byōdō-in, a Buddhist temple in the city of Uji, was built in 1053. Here's a picture! What country do you suppose it's in?
3. “By 1054, Tughril’s forces were contending in Anatolia with the Byzantines and in 1055 he was commissioned by the Abbasid Caliph Al-Qa'im to recapture Baghdad from the Buyids.” Tughril was, again, the leader of what important emerging Turkish empire?
4. “According to Pipil texts, Antiguo Cuscatlán was founded as Cuzcatlan in 1054 by Topiltzin Atzil, the last king of Tula of Anahuac. It was a city populated by ten thousand, with an additional twelve thousand people who lived in xacal, straw huts distributed at the edge of a maar (crater) which housed the sacred lake of Cuscatlan.”
Today, Antigo Cuscatlán is a town of about 48,000 in a country whose name begins with an “E.” What country?
5. A 1054 diplomatic mission turned into a fiasco when Cardinal Humbert, a papal legate, claimed the authority to excommunicate the Patriarch of Constantinople; the Patriarch, in response, excommunicated Cardinal Humbert and his colleagues. This fracas is generally considered the watershed moment of what great historical process?
6. In 1055, Gruffydd ap Llywelyn, King of Gwynedd and Powys, gained control of the territories of Morgannwg and Gwent. From 1055 to 1063 he would rule over the entire territory of his country, the only king ever to do so until it fell under the control of a more powerful neighboring kingdom. Of what country was Gruffydd ap Llywelyn king?
7. In the Irrawaddy Valley, King Anawrahta was the first great ruler of the Pagan Empire. Improvements in irrigation during his reign made the kingdom's core into a powerhouse of rice production; this, combined with an efficient system of taxation and administration, allowed Anawrahta to annex or control most of the surrounding kingdoms beginning in the mid-1050s. Here’s a best-guess map at the ultimate extent of Anawrahta’s rule.
What modern country is the most direct decendent of the Pagan Empire?
8. In 1056, in an island country whose historical record is remarkably well-preserved, we know that one Ísleifur Gissurarson became the first bishop of Skálholt. Where did Gissurarson live?
9. In 1059, Pope Nicolas II issue the bull In nomine Domini. It curtailed the Holy Roman Emporer’s “right of approbation” and established the basic rules that are still used today for what process?
10. Also in 1059, King Peter Krešimir IV came to the throne. Under his rule, his country would expand to its greatest territorial extent in history… so far, of course. Here’s a map of his kingdom at the high point. Of what country is King Peter Krešimir IV also sometimes called “King Peter Krešimir the Great”?
Last Week's New Monday Quiz Classic (tm)
E, The Dutch Revolt, starting 1568ish.
G, The Glorious Revolution, starting 1688.
B, American Independence, 1776.
I, South American Independence, early 1800s.
J, German Unification (part 1), 1871.
H, The Russian Revolution, 1916.
C, The Chinese Revolution, 1949.
A, African Independence, 1950s/60s.
F, Portugal Throws in the Colonial Towel, 1975.
D, The USSR Splits, 1991.
That gives us two big winners: Christine M. and Unwise Owl both have perfect scores. Perfect, I tell you! Although everyone did quite well I thought. It's the Owl's second grand slam in two weeks!
Saturday, July 18, 2015
The Infinite Art Tournament, Round One: Mucha v. Munch!
Alphonse Mucha
1860 - 1939
Czech
-----
Edvard Munch
1863 - 1944
Norwegian
----
Vote for the artist of your choice! Votes go in the comments. Commentary and links to additional work are welcome. Polls open for at least one month past posting.
1860 - 1939
Czech
-----
Edvard Munch
1863 - 1944
Norwegian
----
Vote for the artist of your choice! Votes go in the comments. Commentary and links to additional work are welcome. Polls open for at least one month past posting.
Friday, July 17, 2015
At the Movies: "Wages of Fear"
Wages of Fear
Henri-Georges Clouzot, 1953.
imbd: 8.1 (imdb 250: #167)
Ebert: Four Stars.
Rotten Tomatoes: 100% (!) Fresh
The Wages of Fear is an existentialist action movie in which four men, because of the absurd conditions of their existence, attempt to drive trucks packed with nitroglycerin over a crude, dangerous road across a Latin American wilderness. It is well-filmed and well-made in general; it's at times suspenseful, exciting, amusing, and even touching, albeit in a tough, he-man, Hemingwayesque sort of way. It's quite good! But I did not catch whatever it is that has earned it the amazing credentials listed above.
Clouzot clearly intended his movie to make a statement about the degradation of men by the forces of industrial capitalism. That's cool, but the swaggering, posturing conception of masculinity he brings to the party really lowers the level. Just to make sure we understand how tough these guys are, a long opening act set in a raw frontier town is drawn out to include some superfluous barroom scuffles and some arguments about whether it is worth spending time with women when could be having worldly masculine conversations with one's pals. There is only one real female character in the movie; her role is to be despised by the men because she doesn't admire them when they indulge in self-destructive behavior, to be pushed around a little, and to have nice breasts. All in all, Wages of Fear doesn't have a lot of credibility as social criticism.
In his review of Wages of Fear, Roger Ebert noted with approval that it is free from the "childishness of the obligatory happy ending." In an American movie, we would know from the outset that the hero's truck would make it to the end of the road; in a European movie of the 1950s, we know that the hero could be blown up at any moment. Not knowing in advance how the movie will end increases the level of suspense, and makes a happy ending more satisfying if that's where we eventually end up. I agree with that completely. However, I also feel that it is possible to go far enough in the other direction and stage a grim ending for the sake of a grim ending that, if it's not "childish," is however a bit sophomoric. "This is going to end badly," you can imagine a director saying, "because that's how life is, man." I'm not saying that's what happens in Wages of Fear, mind you. I say nothing about how it ends. That might spoil it for you.
Plot: The nitroglycerin needs to get from Point A to Point B in order to blow out, literally, a raging fire over an oil well. The company doesn't have proper equipment to move it, so hires drivers from among the riffraff who hang around Point A. The idea is that with two trucks making the trip, there's a pretty good chance that one of them will make it to the other side. It's a bad road, and the drivers face many obstacles along the way.
Visuals: Beautifully filmed in black and white, with the south of France standing in for Latin America. The frontier town where the movie starts, and then bogs down for a while, is delightfully shabby, and populated with a terrific multicultural cast of extras. It's a very convincing imagined place, the kind of utilitarian town that no one loves and whose citizens would all leave tomorrow, if they could afford to start over someplace else. The road itself winds through lovely, and lovingly photographed, countryside. The special effects when things collapse or explode, as things occasionally will in action movies, are quite spectacular. Some scenes could be textbook examples of how a montage of individually meaningless images -- machine parts, men's expressions, landscapes, and so on -- can be sequenced into a coherent dramatic scene in which every viewer understands exactly what is going on and why it is exciting.
Dialogue: There's a bit more talk about fear, and how a man ought properly to overcome his fear, then I really found necessary. It is, incidentally, a very loud movie, mostly loud with the roar of the truck engines. "I thought you were watching a war movie," said Mrs.5000, who had been down the hall. "Every movie is really a war movie," I said. "Because that's how life is, man."
Prognosis: Personally, I think that action movies are one area in which humanity has made impressive advancements over the past century. But this old one is certainly a good one if you can get past its relentless macho posturing.
Michael5000's imdb rating: 7.
Thursday, July 16, 2015
The Infinite Art Tournament, Round Two: Oudry v. Metsu!
Jean Baptiste Oudry
1686 - 1755
French
Finished First in Phase 1, Flight 9 of the Play-In Tournament, with a voting score of 1.000.
Finished First in Phase 2, Flight 6 of the Play-In Tournament, with a voting score of .636.
Beat Gerrard Dou in Round 1.
Gabriel Metsu
1629 - 1667
Dutch
Defeated Mario Merz in Round 1.
Vote for the artist of your choice in the comments, or any other way that works for you. Commentary and links to additional work are welcome. Polls open for at least one month past posting.
1686 - 1755
French
Finished First in Phase 1, Flight 9 of the Play-In Tournament, with a voting score of 1.000.
Finished First in Phase 2, Flight 6 of the Play-In Tournament, with a voting score of .636.
Beat Gerrard Dou in Round 1.
Gabriel Metsu
1629 - 1667
Dutch
Defeated Mario Merz in Round 1.
Vote for the artist of your choice in the comments, or any other way that works for you. Commentary and links to additional work are welcome. Polls open for at least one month past posting.
Wednesday, July 15, 2015
Five Years Ago: The "More Movies" Fiasco Begins!
In 2007, I decided to watch and review all of the 100 films covered in Roger Ebert’s The Great Movies. Five years ago, at the beginning of July 2010, I had finished that project and was starting to miss writing about movies. So I did something pretty characteristic, which was to engage the readers in an elaborate, goofy process to generate a new list of movies for me. I called it the "More Movies" project. It was great. There was a call for nominations, an unnecessarily complicated voting process, and then a final list of the movies to watch.
And then it all went wrong.
At least, that’s the way I remembered it. Actually, I really enjoyed a lot of the movies on my list, especially Rachel Getting Married, In Bruges, No Country for Old Men, and The Assassination of Jesse James etc. Even Avatar, with its copious flaws, was awfully fun to write about.
No, the problem was with the films I disliked – in particular, Up in the Air, The Diving Bell and the Butterfly, Ratatouille, and The Hangover. Not because I’m too virtuous to write a negative review – hell, of course it’s great fun to lay down an occasional negative review – but because I was writing negative reviews after having asked people to give me recommendations. I felt like I was doing this:
I found this rather upsetting, and dropped out of amateur film criticism for a few years. This was no great loss for the world. But, as you might have noticed, I’ve recently jumped back into the cinema-appreciation ring, but this time with a crazy new concept: I’m not working from a list. Well, I'm certainly referencing the imdb 250, but I'm not tied down to a list. I can watch anything I want! With no one personally recommending films to me, I don’t feel like I’m violating someone’s trust if I need to go negative. And besides, since I generally -- not always! -- choose films I expect to like, there are fewer negative reviews to write.
All that having been said, however…
If there’s any film you would like to have me evaluate, discuss, sharpshoot, analyze, praise to the skies, lambast, dismiss, and/or deconstruct, I’d still kind of like to hear about it. I like talking about movies.
And then it all went wrong.
At least, that’s the way I remembered it. Actually, I really enjoyed a lot of the movies on my list, especially Rachel Getting Married, In Bruges, No Country for Old Men, and The Assassination of Jesse James etc. Even Avatar, with its copious flaws, was awfully fun to write about.
No, the problem was with the films I disliked – in particular, Up in the Air, The Diving Bell and the Butterfly, Ratatouille, and The Hangover. Not because I’m too virtuous to write a negative review – hell, of course it’s great fun to lay down an occasional negative review – but because I was writing negative reviews after having asked people to give me recommendations. I felt like I was doing this:
Michael5000: Could you recommend a movie to me?
Innocent Reader: Why, I enjoyed The Diving Bell and the Butterfly very much!
Michael5000: Yeah? Well it’s CRAP, loser!
I found this rather upsetting, and dropped out of amateur film criticism for a few years. This was no great loss for the world. But, as you might have noticed, I’ve recently jumped back into the cinema-appreciation ring, but this time with a crazy new concept: I’m not working from a list. Well, I'm certainly referencing the imdb 250, but I'm not tied down to a list. I can watch anything I want! With no one personally recommending films to me, I don’t feel like I’m violating someone’s trust if I need to go negative. And besides, since I generally -- not always! -- choose films I expect to like, there are fewer negative reviews to write.
All that having been said, however…
If there’s any film you would like to have me evaluate, discuss, sharpshoot, analyze, praise to the skies, lambast, dismiss, and/or deconstruct, I’d still kind of like to hear about it. I like talking about movies.
Tuesday, July 14, 2015
The Infinite Art Tournament, Left Bracket Second Round: Maillol v. Lowry!
Aristide Maillol
1861 - 1944
French
Skunked! Skunked! in a painful bout against Magritte in Round 1.
Beat Bernardino Luini in First Round Elimination.
L.S. Lowry
1887 - 1973
British
Soundly defeated Lucas van Leyden in Round 1.
Lost to Andy Goldsworthy in Round 2.
Vote for the artist of your choice in the comments, or any other way that works for you. Commentary and links to additional work are welcome. Polls open for at least one month past posting, but likely much longer.
1861 - 1944
French
Skunked! Skunked! in a painful bout against Magritte in Round 1.
Beat Bernardino Luini in First Round Elimination.
L.S. Lowry
1887 - 1973
British
Soundly defeated Lucas van Leyden in Round 1.
Lost to Andy Goldsworthy in Round 2.
Vote for the artist of your choice in the comments, or any other way that works for you. Commentary and links to additional work are welcome. Polls open for at least one month past posting, but likely much longer.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





























