Friday, February 8, 2013

Fabulous Prizes: January!


The winner of the IAT Fabulous Prize for January was Candida, one of whose votes was chosen at random from all those cast in February.

As she pointed out, the prize for voting was essentially to have to vote again, this time from the Fabulous Prize menu:
  • Your very own copy of The Art Book (or an equivalent volume).
  • a $20 donation -- or a $30 matching donation -- to a visual arts museum or charity of your choice.
  • a $25 donation towards the arts charity of MY choice, which would be the Portland Art Museum.
  • a batch of Michael5000's regionally famous oatmeal almond chocolate-chip cookies.*
Candida, after careful deliberation, chose the $25 donation towards the arts charity of MY choice.  To streamline the bookkeeping, how we'll handle that is that when Mrs.5000 and I renew our P.A.M. membership in a few months here, an additional $25 will be tacked on in Candida's name.  Well, "in Candida's name."  It won't be official, you understand.  But it will be real.

Other IAT News

1) We've got a Monster First Round face-off coming this weekend.  Holy cow, hang onto your hats!

2) Next week, after a quirky little Element you've never heard of, we'll venture for the first time into the Left Bracket Third Round!!!  We'll be meeting up again with some artists we haven't seen for a while.  Very exciting.

3) The Hypothetical Hypermarathon is suspended, with the poor Avatar sitting all hangdog at the side of a country road, while Michael5000 tries to deal with an epic case of bronchitis.



And, A New Acquisition in the Mrs. & Michael5000 Collection of Contemporary Arts



"Bunny Bot"
Jen Hardwick, 2012
Mixed media, found objects, and bric-a-brac on wooden box core.
9" x 7" x 3"
Christmas 2012 gift, Michael to Mrs.

Thursday, February 7, 2013

The Infinite Art Tournament, Left Bracket Second Round: Canova v. Burra!

Antonio Canova
1757 - 1822
Italian

Put up a fair number of votes in losing to big-name Caravaggio in Round 1.
Took out Robert Campin in First Round Elimination.







Edward Burra
1905 - 1976
British

Beat 20th century Italian abstract artist Alberto Burri in an amazing come-from-behind victory in Round 1.
Lost in heavy voting to France's Gustave Caillebotte Round 2.






Vote for the artist of your choice in the comments, or any other way that works for you. Commentary and links to additional work are welcome. Polls open for at least one month past posting, but likely much longer.

Wednesday, February 6, 2013

The Wednesday Post


Beuys will be Beuys
Apparently the German absurdist had a thing for postal ephemera.

Of course, we've all seen wooden postcards in souvenir shops...


But Beuys' were impractically thick, and thus I suppose more artistic.


Also, the man who brought us the felt suit also offered the felt postcard.


Or collections of odd postcard images in a boxed set!


I know what you're thinking.  You're thinking, "Could I send a Beuys postcard with a Beuys stamp?

The answer is yes.  Yes you could.


Beuys left the Infinite Art Tournament last October, going two-and-out against Bernini and Bingham.  I don't remember him attracting any hostility, but with only four cumulative votes in favor and 24 against, his statistical showing was the worst of any Tournament artist to date.

Tuesday, February 5, 2013

The Infinite Art Tournament, Left Bracket Second Round: Calder v. Canaletto!

Today was supposed to be a Left Bracket Second Round match between the winners of Bellotto/Bierstadt and Bingham/Bellows, but Alison swept down at the last second to create a tie in the latter match.  No problem; we'll just use the week to push a different piece of the Left Bracket along.

Alexander Calder
1898 - 1975
American

Lost to Gustave Caillebotte in Round 1.
Tore into Italian Alberto Burri in Round 1 Elimination.







Canaletto
1697 - 1768
Italian (Venetian); also worked in England

Beat early Flemish master Robert Campin in Round 1 by a single vote. YOUR VOTE COUNTS!!!
Lambasted by Caravaggio in Round 2.







Vote for the artist of your choice in the comments, or any other way that works for you. Commentary and links to additional work are welcome. Polls open for at least one month past posting, but likely much longer.

Monday, February 4, 2013

Saint of the Month: Saint Jeanne of Valois!

Saint Jeanne of Valois, by Jehan Perréal (tournament
non-participant)

St. Jeanne of Valois

AKA: “Joan of France, Duchess of Berry” Jeanne de France, Jeanne de Valois, Jéhanne de France, Queen Joanna, Saint Jane of Valois
Feast Day: February 4.

Really Existed? Without a doubt.
Timeframe: April 23, 1464 – February 4, 1505.
Place: France

Credentials: Canonized in 1950 after centuries of general recognition as saint.
Martyrdom: None of the painful-death variety. Many sources implicitly or explicitly regard her public humiliations as a kind of martyrdom.

Patron Saint of: No known tradition of patronage.
Symbolism: Generally portrayed in the habit of the Order of the Annonciades, which she founded.

There is consensus on the basic facts of St. Jeanne of Valois’ life, as she was a public figure in relatively recent times. She was a daughter of the Louis XI, King of France, and when she was 12 (some sources say 9) she was married to the Duke of Orléans in the kind of political marriage that the feudal system was always cobbling together. The marriage was forced on the Duke, in fact, and a variety of sources testify that it was an unusually unhappy partnership. Twenty-two years after the wedding, the Duke became Louis XII, King of France. A nasty divorce trial ensued, ending in an annulment that allowed Louis XII to marry Anne of Brittany, the late king’s young widow. St. Jeanne retired to Bourges and founded a Franciscan order, the Annociades, which is still a going concern with six chapter houses.

A key mystery in the story is the nature and extent of St. Jeanne’s physical disability. Estimates range from some sort of monstrously grotesque deformity to perhaps no particularly disability at all. She herself doesn’t seem to have thought there was much wrong with her, although I’m hearing that assertion at about 8th hand.  In some tellings, endurance of physical challenge is the crux of her saintliness, as when American Catholic states approvingly that “she accepted her disabilities with patience.”

In any telling, St. Jeanne’s story revolves around her relationship to Louis XII. The Catholic Encyclopedia,* which can reasonably be assumed to represent the religious viewpoint, tells it this way:
For political purposes of his own, Louis XI compelled Jeanne to marry Louis, Duke of Orléans, his second cousin, and heir presumptive to the throne. After her marriage, the princess suffered even more than before, for the duke hated the wife imposed upon him, and even publicly insulted her in every possible way. She, imagining virtues in her husband that did not exist, loved him tenderly, and when he got into disgrace and was imprisoned exerted herself to mitigate his sufferings and to get him freed. No sooner, however, was the duke, on the death of Charles VIII, raised to the throne of France as Louis XII, than he got his marriage with Jeanne annulled at Rome, on the ground that it was invalid, from lack of consent, and from the fact that it had never been consummated; and the saint's humiliations reached their climax when she found herself, in the face of all France, an unjustly repudiated wife and queen.
This is all true, as far as I can tell, except the “heir presumptive” part (Charles VIII came between Louises XI and XII, and the Duke of Orléans was in fact something of an outside bet for the crown at the time of his first marriage). The tone is certainly a bit hard on Louis and his “virtues that did not exist,” and leaves us vulnerable to surprise when we learn that Louis XII was widely considered a highly capable and successful king, who used to be called the “Father of the People” by the French. We are given no context for the divorce and annulment, but this is perhaps to the Encyclopedia’s credit; other sources often imply that Louis was simply pushing over Jeanne in order to hook up with a hot little number half his age. But Anne of Brittany, a capable woman with a mind of her own, was at 22 a twice-married, divorced, widowed woman who had been pretty much continuously pregnant since she was 15 yet had already buried all four of her children. Attractive she may have been, but a sweet young plaything for the new king to dally with she was not.
Sainte Jeanne de Valois, by
Jean Mazoyer** (tournament non-participant)

What Anne of Brittany was, was Brittany, in the same sense that Louis XII, as soon as he became the King of France, was France. For those two entities to remain connected and able to hold their own against the other coalescing states of Renaissance Europe, the logic of the feudal system required a personal contract between their leaders. Louis may have been a cad to St. Jeanne – indeed, even his biggest fans concede the point – but there was nothing personal about the humiliations of her divorce. She was merely a victim of statecraft, like all of those far luckier princesses who populate the fairy tales.

How humiliating was the divorce? Well, it couldn’t have been much fun:
Louis claimed, with the wealth of physical detail required to sustain his accusation of malformation, that he had been unable to have sexual relations with his wife. This was not only an unpleasant, but an uncertain charge.  Jeanne was able to produce evidence to the contrary including witnesses who swore that the king had come in one morning saying, "I have earned, and well earned a drink, for I mounted my wife three or four times during the night." Louis also pleaded that his own performance had been impeded by witchcraft.  In that case, answered Jeanne, how was he able to know what it was like to try to make love to her?
This account -- from J.R. Hale’s 1971 Renaissance Europe : individual and society, 1480-1520 -- is a bit dissonant with conventional renderings of the Jeanne story. A representative article in the singularly named blog “Suffering With Joy,” for instance, calls St. Jane of Valois “surely an example of humility” and suggests that “St. Jane saw [her divorce] as a great blessing.”

Well, people are complicated, and it is conceivable that Jeanne of Valois was exuding humility and devoutly hoping for the divorce to go through even as she called witnesses to testify to the frequency of her marital relations. But the way the the St. Jeanne story takes on different textures as you look at it from different angles also serves as a good illustration of something that is perhaps so obvious that it doesn’t need illustrating.  That is, that to write hagiography – to talk about a saint in terms of their saintliness – is generally going to mean removing her from the complexity of her context. Saints are meant to be human exemplars, or so I’ve always supposed, but to cast a person as a saint is to focus so much on the simplicity of their virtues, and so little on the inherent messiness of their humanity, as to render them just slightly other than human.  It makes them awfully difficult to emulate.

---

*Starting to be suspicious that the old-fashioned scholarship and rhetoric of the Catholic Encyclopedia might be too much of a good thing, I investigated and realized that the version I've been using for the past year is the 1910 edition, which is doubtless available only because it has fallen into the public domain.  Amateur hagiography is, alas, something of a pay-to-play proposition, and the good up-to-date resources come with a price tag.  

** "The painter Jean Limousin Mazoyer (around 1620-1686) brushed, during a ten-year stay in Bordeaux (1665-1675), a dozen religious paintings, all inspired to varying degrees of classical painting and Franco-Italian (Flemish Raphael, Reni, Poussin, Chardin ...).  Since many of these works, the Sainte Jeanne de Valois , painted in 1666 for the Annunciation, oscillates between the naive picture of piety (the main group) and paint scholarly (Annunciation medallions angular copied after Philippe de Champaigne )."  What did we do before machine translation?  This seems, incidentally, to be the entirety of the information about Jean Mazoyer available on the internet.

Saturday, February 2, 2013

The Infinite Art Tournament, Round FOUR: Botticelli v. Bruegel!


The third match of the Fourth Round of the Infinite Art Tournament is a battle of household names!  Botticelli has run up more votes than any previous fourth-rounder -- 36 in his favor to 12 against -- but now he's up against Pieter Breugel, who has cumulative 41-6 vote count.  How could either artist possibly lose?  Yet only one can advance....



Sandro Botticelli
1445 - 1510
Florentine
  • Beat Colombian Fernando Botero in an amazing come-from-behind victory in Round 1.
  • Made short work of 18th century France's François Boucher in Round 2.
  • Disposed of Aussie Arthur Boyd in Round 3.








Pieter Bruegel (the Elder)
c.1525 - 1569
Dutch
  • Trounced his own son, Jan Bruegel the Elder, in Round 1.
  • Won easily against living artist Daniel Buren in Round 2.
  • Scorched respectable Victorian Ford Maddox Brown in Round 3.







Vote for the artist of your choice in the comments, or any other way that works for you. Commentary and links to additional work are welcome. Fourth-round matches are open for at least three months after posting.

Friday, February 1, 2013

On Not Drinking

Last spring or thereabouts, I read Mike Doughty’s The Book of Drugs. Doughty is one of my favorite rock guys and no dumb cluck, and he put together a very readable memoir of a reasonably common type: the struggles of a guy in the entertainment industry to escape the travails and humiliations of drug and alcohol addiction.

One minor theme of the Book of Drugs is that, although nobody (outside of the tobacco and gambling industries) is “pro-addiction” per se, people in general tend to throw a lot of stumbling blocks in the way of those who are trying to clean themselves up. I thought that was kind of interesting, and wanted to learn more. So, as a kind of experiment in kitchen social science, I decided to stop drinking.

To be absolutely clear: I am not a recovering alcoholic, and I certainly am not claiming to have gone through a similar ordeal. In the pre-experiment phase, I was your basic American adult, drinking socially and on very occasional evenings in, enjoying alcohol a little more than most people both because I’m a complete lightweight and because I am the very opposite of a mean drunk. I’m the sentimental, affectionate, in-love-with-the-world kind of drunk. I am also a self-limiting drunk, in that after a few drinks I start losing track of my glass or bottle and forgetting to continue with the drinking.

The interesting thing is that – despite alcohol being a trivial part of my lifestyle – my decision to “stop drinking” has been surprisingly difficult. The first hurdle came at social gatherings with friends. They offered alcohol – beer, wine – as good hosts will. And when offered something, I realized, it is a little rude to decline, or to ask for an alternative. Often, the declining needs, or seems to need, an explanation: “I’m not drinking anymore” or “I don’t drink alcohol.” With friends who have known me for a while, that led either to overt follow-up questions (“Since when?” “Seriously?” “Why the hell not?”) or to puzzled looks of concern which might has well have been overt questions, since in fairness they demanded some sort of reassuring answer. And the point here of course is not that my friends tried to bully or coerce me into drinking alcohol against my own wishes; of course they didn’t. The point is that in ordinary circumstances, it required more expenditure of social energy to not drink than it would have to just go with the flow, to drink.

My in-laws took Mrs.5000 and me on a cruise to the Canadian Maritimes after I was, um, a few months clean, and once again – with these entirely respectable, temperate folks – not drinking was difficult. My parents-in-law – so little interested in spirits that my father-in-law for while entertained the ludicrous notion that I was a “wine expert” – are in the common habit of marking a special occasion with a glass or a bottle. Since sharing of wine is a communal thing, though, it loses all luster if someone bows out. So, in sticking to my decision not to drink, I had to single myself out and see a look of disappointment, maybe even of hurt, in my father-in-law’s face. Every night. On a cruise ship, where there are scores of people around whose entire job is to sell you alcoholic beverages. Having read Doughty’s book, we recognized a coded message advertising an Alcoholics Anonymous meeting on board every day, and could well imagine that someone in recovery would need a daily meeting, bad, in that environment.

One has read that spouses and partners are often the greatest obstacle facing recovering alcoholics. Although Mrs.5000 would be entirely supportive if I were in real recovery, she knows that I’m not, and because of that she has provided an interesting simulation of the unsupportive spouse. She sees my not-drinking, reasonably enough, as a passing whim, and has been heard to say things like “do you want to order wine, or are you still not drinking?” or “are you going to make an exception for Thanksgiving?” (If this sounds harsh, I should mention that when I stopped drinking I sent mixed signals about the duration and totality of the fast.) Even in my laboratory experience, these kind of remarks have felt just a little bit undercutting, and I can’t help but think that in real life they must feel completely disempowering.

The upshot? I’ve found that when people say that there are social forces that make it hard for someone to stop drinking, they’re damned right. It’s hard to decline alcohol without being marked out as a prig or a letdown, sometimes by one’s self but often, quite openly, by others. (And by the way, to any number of people at whom, in my life, I have rolled my eyes at their silly tee-totaling: sorry, guys!)

The question going forward is, of course, whether to make the experiment permanent. On one hand, who needs the calories, or the expense? But on the other hand, is there any particular point in my not going with the flow, not joining the circle of people who are more or less ceremonially sharing the goblet? Or for that matter, in not getting pleasantly trashed on an occasional holiday? I don’t know. I feel not-drinking gradually shifting from experiment to habit. I feel myself trying on the idea that I am Someone Who Doesn’t Drink. But at this moment, I’m still Schroedinger’s drinking buddy with the box unopened. One of these days the lid will come off, and only then will I be revealed either as a non-drinker, or as somebody who once went a long time without taking a drink.