Friday, May 8, 2015
At the Movies: "The Fall"
The Fall
Tarsem Singh, 2006.
imbd score: 7.9
Ebert: Four Stars.
Rotten Tomatoes: 59% Fresh
Mrs.5000 and I have thought of The Fall as one of our favorite movies since we watched in on the big screen in 2006, but we hadn't seen it since. I remembered it mostly as a visual treat, packed with strange and exotic images. I had forgotten that it is also a sweet and moving story, featuring one of the most charming performances ever put in by a child actor, Catinca Untaru. It is an eccentric movie, but very entertaining and extremely lovely to look at. Aside from lukewarm marketing -- the posters are not great, and the title could be better -- I am at a bit of a loss as to why it did not become an international blockbuster, or at least generate a more substantial cult following. It's a truly beautiful movie.
Plot: At the front end of the 20th century, two patients meet in a Los Angeles hospital. One is a stunt man, bedridden after a serious accident during a shoot. The other is Alexandria, a little girl from a Romanian migrant family, her arm badly broken during work in the orange groves. They befriend each other, and the stunt man begins telling the girl an elaborate and meandering story -- an "epic," he promises -- drawing inspiration from his life in the movies and people they see around them in the hospital.
As the stunt man tells his story, we begin to see it played out in the vivid imagination of the girl, distorted by her innocence and by her incomplete mastery of English. This play-within-a-play, a swashbuckling adventure yarn, is shot in extravagant colors. Its characters perform feats of daring-do against a succession of dazzlingly beautiful landscapes. It is a simple enough tale, but its premises are very fluid, because details of plot and character are constantly being negotiated between teller and hearer -- Alexandria has ideas of her own about what makes a good story -- and because, as events progress, the "real world" begins to intrude more and more into the fantasy.
Visuals: The opening credits play over vivid black-and-white slow-motion shots of some kind of trouble on a railroad bridge; we will eventually realize that we were seeing the stunt man's accident. These images set the tone for the photography throughout the movie. They are quite lovely, combining Henri Cartier-Bresson's eye for incident with Ansel Adams' crisp monochromatic spectrum, and nudging them gently into moving life.
The Fall's Los Angeles of the 1910s is reproduced with exquisite care, with sets, costumes, and props conspiring in a setting that is somehow both historically plausible and on the verge of the fantastical. The strange landscapes of the story, on the other hand, are riotously surreal from the get-go -- and yet the film was filmed entirely in real world locations, with a bare minimum of computer effects. In terms of sheer visual magnificence, The Fall is unlike any other movie I have seen.
Dialogue: Although much of the charm of the movie comes from the affection between Alexandria and her grown-up friend, much of the dialog is about how little they really understand each other. She is a child, blind to entire categories of adult issues and wrestling with English to boot; he is consumed with his own concerns, and does not always look out for the well-being of his young friend.
A detail: The Fall gets Alexandria's broken English exactly right. Movies in general are terrible at this, and if you have spent much time around people who are learning the language you can tell that most scriptwriters have not. Alexandria's Romaniglish is spot-on perfect, and I have to think that Catinca Untaru really was learning English while the movie was filmed, and given lots of freedom to make a hash out of her lines in the printed script. The effect is delightful.
Prognosis: The Fall is one of my very favorite movies.
Michael 5000's imdb rating: 10.
Thursday, May 7, 2015
The Infinite Art Tournament, Left Bracket Second Round: LeWitt v. Hayter!
Sol LeWitt
1928 - 2007
American
Lost to Britain's Wyndham Lewis in Round 1.
Won easily against Roy Lichtenstein in First Round Elimination.
Stanley William Hayter
1901 - 1988
British
Tied with Raoul Hausmann in his first try at Round One.
Beat Erich Heckel in a second go at Round 1 by a two-vote swing. YOUR VOTE COUNTS!!!
Could not even drum up a single vote against Leonardo da Vinci in Round 2.
Vote for the artist of your choice in the comments, or any other way that works for you. Commentary and links to additional work are welcome. Polls open for at least one month past posting, but likely much longer.
1928 - 2007
American
Lost to Britain's Wyndham Lewis in Round 1.
Won easily against Roy Lichtenstein in First Round Elimination.
Stanley William Hayter
1901 - 1988
British
Tied with Raoul Hausmann in his first try at Round One.
Beat Erich Heckel in a second go at Round 1 by a two-vote swing. YOUR VOTE COUNTS!!!
Could not even drum up a single vote against Leonardo da Vinci in Round 2.
Vote for the artist of your choice in the comments, or any other way that works for you. Commentary and links to additional work are welcome. Polls open for at least one month past posting, but likely much longer.
Wednesday, May 6, 2015
The Wednesday Post
Recap of an American Roadtrip, part 1
a complicated, contentious, and long-drawn-out process of racial desegregation and gender integration
...in which we find out what's happening these days at the sites of last week's boring postcards!
Ralfroy Motel
2½ miles east of Boise’s Business District on Highways 30 and 20
BATTLE OF PIQUA MARKER
The Battle of Piqua Marker is still there. It commemorates a series of skirmishes in which
the Shawnees and their British Allies were defeated by General George Rogers Clark with his army of Kentucky Frontiersmen. This battle greatly advanced the cause of the American Revolution on the Western Front.This isn't exactly false, but the "British Allies" seem to be a guy who had a store that the Shawnee liked to shop at. And sure, Piqua was the most important battle of the "Western Front," but to the extent that it had "fronts," the American Revolution was all Eastern Front, right?
Well, whatever. The monument was erected in 1953, so the little kids in the first picture are likely in their early 70s today. I wonder if they ever knew they were on a postcard.
There is as much information about the marker as you could possibly want at the Historical Marker Database, from which I borrowed this nice photograph taken by Dale K. Pennington. I think the marker looks kind of sweet poking out of its little bed of Echinacea.
LANIER BOYS’ HIGH SCHOOL, MACON, GA.
The building shown in the postcard also no longer exists. It was burned down by hooligans in April 1967. I can't figure out exactly where it stood. But the building of its one time counterpart for girls, Miller High, still exists as an attractive abandoned ruin near the current Central High Campus.
FLAGSHIP HOTEL
I don't know about you, but if someone came to me seeking investment for a big hotel built on stilts over the Gulf of Mexico in Galveston, my first question would be, "but wouldn't it get beat to hell by every passing hurricane?" And the answer would be yes. Yes, it would.
That's a photo after 1983's Hurricane Alicia, but it was 2008's Hurricane Ike that finally shut the Flagship down. And so it is that the Flagship Hotel no longer exists.
On its old pilings, the Galveston Island Historic Pleasure Pier now stands. It is a prefabricated version of an old-fashioned tourist boardwalk, and it looks to be the very epitome of "pleasure" as envisaged by a ten year old boy hopped up on cotton candy and high fructose corn syrup.
It, too, will be beat to hell by every passing hurricane, but it will be much, much cheaper to repair.
American Falls of Niagara under illumination.
Tuesday, May 5, 2015
The Infinite Art Tournament, Left Bracket Second Round: Heckel v. Lewis!
Erich Heckel
1883 - 1944
German
Tied with Jan Davidsz de Heem in his Tournament debut.
Lost to Stanley William Hayter in his second try at Round 1.
Beat Sir Peter Lely by a single vote in First Round Elimination. YOUR VOTE COUNTS!!!
Wyndham Lewis
1882 - 1957
British
Beat Sol LeWitt in easily in Round 1.
Lost to the Limbourg Brothers in Round 2.
Vote for the artist of your choice in the comments, or any other way that works for you. Commentary and links to additional work are welcome. Polls open for at least one month past posting, but likely much longer.
1883 - 1944
German
Tied with Jan Davidsz de Heem in his Tournament debut.
Lost to Stanley William Hayter in his second try at Round 1.
Beat Sir Peter Lely by a single vote in First Round Elimination. YOUR VOTE COUNTS!!!
Wyndham Lewis
1882 - 1957
British
Beat Sol LeWitt in easily in Round 1.
Lost to the Limbourg Brothers in Round 2.
Vote for the artist of your choice in the comments, or any other way that works for you. Commentary and links to additional work are welcome. Polls open for at least one month past posting, but likely much longer.
Monday, May 4, 2015
The New Monday Quiz XIV
Anyone who refuses to play the New Monday Quiz spends a night in the box!
1. Here are the functional uses to which a popular element were being put in 2010. Name that element!
2. Its plot summary on "Sparknotes" includes this sentence. Name that book!
Buck is kidnapped by a gardener on the Miller estate and sold to dog traders, who teach Buck to obey by beating him with a club and, subsequently, ship him north to the Klondike.
3. It's notoriously difficult for an animal to come back from extinction, but this one, long thought to have disappeared in the Cretacious, kind of pulled it off when a living specimen was discovered in 1938. Name that fish!
4. He ordered Operation Eagle Claw, a 1980 raid-turned-fiasco that resulted in the deaths of eight American soldiers and the loss or capture of seven military aircraft.
5. Vermeer painted Woman With a Pearl Necklace, but who painted Woman with a Pearl Necklace in a Loge?
6. It's the word that means "a substance that increases the rate of a chemical reaction without itself undergoing any permanent chemical change."
7. This man is feeling less and less hungry. He is the title character of what 1967 movie?
8. It's from the Ancient Greek word Χριστός, meaning "anointed."
9. It's a population map of the 128th most populous country in the world. Name that country!
10. Its Wiki plot summary says that it:
tells the story of two sets of identical twins that were accidentally separated at birth. Antipholus of Syracuse and his servant, Dromio of Syracuse, arrive in Ephesus, which turns out to be the home of their twin brothers, Antipholus of Ephesus and his servant, Dromio of Ephesus. When the Syracusans encounter the friends and families of their twins, a series of wild mishaps based on mistaken identities lead to wrongful beatings, a near-seduction, the arrest of Antipholus of Ephesus, and false accusations of infidelity, theft, madness, and demonic possession.Name that cultural production!
Saturday, May 2, 2015
The Semi-Finals: Bierstadt v. Botticelli!

"Semifinals" designates the Fourth to Seventh Rounds of the Infinite Art Tournament. This is a Left Bracket Fourth Round Match between Albert Bierstadt (5-1, 51-29, .638) and Sandro Botticelli (3-1, 40-21, .656). Leaving the Tournament after falling to Bierstadt is Giovanni Bellini (3-2, 35-32, .522).
Albert Bierstadt
1830 - 1902
German-born American
- Defeated fellow 19th Century American George Caleb Bingham in a powerhouse Round 1 match-up.
- Lost to 17th century sculptor Gianlorenzo Bernini in Round 2.
- Thumped Bernardo Bellotto in the Left Bracket Second Round.
- Confirmed his earlier victory over George Caleb Bingham, with interest, in the Tournament's first-ever Grudge Match.
- Snuck by the poet/printer William Blake by a two-vote swing in the Left Bracket Third Round. YOUR VOTE COUNTS!!!
- Held out against Giovanni Bellini in Left Bracket Third Round Elimination.
Sandro Botticelli
1445 - 1510
Florentine
- Beat Colombian Fernando Botero in an amazing come-from-behind victory in Round 1.
- Made short work of 18th century France's François Boucher in Round 2.
- Disposed of Aussie Arthur Boyd in Round 3.
- Lost to Pieter Bruegel in Round 4.
Friday, May 1, 2015
At the Movies: "Whiplash"
Whiplash
Damien Chazelle, 2014.
Current imbd score: 8.5 (imdb 250: #38)
Ebert: Never got to see it.
Rotten Tomatoes: 95%(!) Fresh
Provenance: Watched on DVD with Mrs.5000 on Morgan's recommendation.
Whiplash explores the strange relationship between a drummer at an elite jazz conservatory, and his explosively abrasive mentor, Terence Fletcher. Fletcher, who conducts the conservatory's elite band, believes that merit can only be achieved by persistence through adversity. He provides the adversity. He ritually humiliates, screams abuse at, and occasionally throws stuff at his student musicians. "There are no two words in the English language more harmful," he believes, "than 'good job,'" because those words tell someone that they have reached a satisfactory level of performance and don't need to keep striving. His approach to critiquing a "just OK" performance would be more along the lines of shouting at the player, in front of his or her peers, that they were playing like shit and wasting his time. The theory, of course, is that the student will rededicate himself or herself to practice in order to avoid a repeat of the humiliation next time around.
Well, it's not a pedagogical approach that works for everyone. It is, however, an approach that kind of works for Andrew, the student at the center of the story. Andrew dreams of greatness. He wants to be the best jazz drummer in the world, and we are meant to understand that this is no delusion. He really has the talent to get there, if he works at it hard enough. In an ordinary movie, this would set up a series of challenges to be overcome with a brilliant and satisfying triumph at the end. In Whiplash, what we get is more of a sustained questioning of the whole nature of the quest for greatness.
As his musical skill develops, we will see Andrew become alienated first from people who are merely really good at less obscure endeavors, and then from pretty much everyone -- everyone, that is, except the mentor who honors his passion for excellence by heaping scorn and derision on any deviation from sheer perfection. Is success worth this much sacrifice? At what point does devotion to honing a skill become a compulsive madness? Is it OK to demean the merely capable, if that is what you have to do to foster the occasional genius? Many viewers will leave the movie with strong opinions, but to its credit Whiplash doesn't really give you answers to these questions.
Nor is this a movie that gives you the lazy luxury of a good guy and a bad guy. We are given occasional glimpses of Fletcher, though he inarguably a profoundly difficult, unprofessional, and probably dangerous man, being decent, thoughtful, and kind. Andrew, though he commands our sympathy throughout, is also arrogant, reckless, and sometimes shockingly callous. Like many of us, although hopefully more so, both of them are at their worst when motivated by high ideals. The two men are ultimately locked in a strange and passionate conflict of wills, one that might easily be called destructive or even devastating if the film ended ten or twenty minutes earlier than it actually does. The final minutes, for better or worse, make it a little harder to make a quick summary judgement.
By getting so caught up in the film's ideas, I have completely failed to convey that Whiplash is an electrifying visual celebration of the art of the trap kit. It can not be an easy thing to synchronize your movements to complex percussion, but the actor Miles Teller does an amazing job of convincing us that it is really him playing the drums, in complex and variable meter, and in solos of mesmerizing complexity. This is a challenging movie to watch -- probably especially so for people who have been yelled at a lot in their lives -- but it is also kind of an amazing movie to watch.
Plot: See above. As an aside, but for the record -- and this is spoiler territory -- I've noticed that a lot of commentary on Whiplash has made an unwarranted assumption. Per the Wiki summary: "Andrew agrees to testify." It is actually not at all clear whether Andrew testifies or not, and the story is more interesting with the ambiguity intact.
Visuals: Dark tones to fit the mood, with a spectrum of gold and brown drums, practice rooms, and concert halls. Occasional alarming scarlet highlights. The editing is kind of miraculous. Also, check out the way Fletcher's immaculate wardrobe is used to convey his personality and authority, right from the opening scene.
Dialogue: All of the characters are highly intelligent, diligent people. That doesn't mean that everything that comes out of their mouths is well thought through and constructive.
Prognosis: A very entertaining film, full of surprises. Lovely to watch, exciting to listen to, highly engaging, often disturbing, and packed with all sorts of interesting social questions without offering any easy answers. This is my kinda movie. Maybe it's your kinda movie too.
Michael 5000's imdb rating: 9.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




































